20 Nov 2025
Category : Polity & Governance
Article 32 – Dr B R Ambedkar’s Vision
Article 32 was born out of Dr B R Ambedkar’s Vision articulated during Constituent Assembly debates, according to CJI Gavai.
The History of introduction of Article 32 - the Heart & Soul of the Constitution
When the Objective Resolution was presented in 1946, according to Ambedkar, it lacked two crucial aspects –
- While Resolution spoke about Rights, it did not provide Remedies.
- Rights without Remedies are meaningless.
This led to incorporation of Article 32, enabling citizens to approach Supreme Court for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights.
Let’s learn more about Article 32 -
Article 32- Right to Constitutional Remedies for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights of an aggrieved citizen.
The Supreme Court has ruled that Article 32 is a Basic Structure of the Constitution.
Article 32 has four provisions –
- Right to move to the Supreme Court directly for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights.
- The Supreme Court can issue Writs for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. There are five types of Writs
- Habeas Corpus – To produce the body of the detained person and then examine the cause and legality of detention.
- Mandamus – Issued by a court to a Public Official asking him to perform his duties.
- Prohibition – Issued by higher court to lower court or Tribunal to prevent the latter from exceeding its jurisdiction.
- Certiorari – Issued by higher court to lower court to transfer a case.
- Quo – Warranto – To enquire about the legality of claim of a person to a public office.
- Parliament can empower any courts to issue directions, order & writs. However High Cort under Article 226 has already been conferred with these powers.
- Right to move to the Supreme Court shall not be suspended except otherwise provided by the Constitution. Ex – During National Emergency U/A 359 the President can suspend this provision.